I'm still undecided but very acutely aware that few of the main parties give a fuck about trans rights. As a gay guy I'm a bit privileged in that there's some distance between me and the front line - but I'm also well aware that my neck could well be next on the chopping block. It's not a "culture war" issue for me, it's a human rights and "am I going to be next?" one. I can't think of many things worse than forcing someone to live a life as someone they're not.
We can disagree on what "the legal framework for trans/enby recognition" should look like, but I'd hope that I can agree with most people following that a pathway should exist for people to live as who they are. Whether that's trans, enby, a 6-ft tall dog, or whatever their identity happens to be. And it should be OK for that to change over time, I'm not the same person I was a few years ago, much less ten, twenty, thirty.
@Phil M0OFX ("You didn't mention 4-ft tall dogs! Discrimination!") There seem to be a huge number of (older?) people who just can't (or don't want to) get out of the mindset where a person needs to look like one of a very small number of archetypes, and must behave like that archetype and that must be their identity and never change. Man, woman, child. Butcher, baker, priest, builder. Nobleman, king. All answers they'd expect to "what are you?" Everyone expected to have one fixed role, one "station" in life, and never change, except maybe in certain sanctioned ways. Very feudal and I hope we can get rid of this well within our lifetimes.
@Phil M0OFX Each person has only one shot at life. If the purpose of it is for everyone to get as much enjoyment and fulfilment out of it as possible, it's necessary to stop persecuting people for behaving in ways that increase their own happiness and don't harm anyone else's. (Not counting, of course, those people who deliberately get upset when they see other people leading a fulfilling life. 😠)
Content warning: UKpol, UKGE, trans+gay rights